Thank you for the kind review! As you state, talk of efficiency in an anarcho-capitalist system is very misplaced (although still interesting, I’ll have to read Leeson).
Movement towards equilibrium would be violent, whereas equilibrium itself would be oppressive, as history has shown.
Another excellent post, Cyril. To my mind, arguments for anarcho-capitalism are no more convincing than arguments for other utopian fever dreams. I find them especially obnoxious coming from those who otherwise deny utopia, while conveniently ignoring the utopian nature of their own preference s.
Thank you for the kind review! As you state, talk of efficiency in an anarcho-capitalist system is very misplaced (although still interesting, I’ll have to read Leeson).
Movement towards equilibrium would be violent, whereas equilibrium itself would be oppressive, as history has shown.
Another excellent post, Cyril. To my mind, arguments for anarcho-capitalism are no more convincing than arguments for other utopian fever dreams. I find them especially obnoxious coming from those who otherwise deny utopia, while conveniently ignoring the utopian nature of their own preference s.
That's indeed an inconsistency at the heart of many anarcho-capitalist arguments!